Bulgaria vs Denmark: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition

Bulgaria
2,756 Persons
in 2025
Denmark
2,120 Persons
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
29th
Denmark rank
32nd

Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Denmark
01.0k2.0k3.0k198320042025

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 2,756 Persons against 2,120 Persons in Denmark, a difference of 636 Persons.

That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.3 times Denmark's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 29th and Denmark ranks 32nd of 40 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 2,803 Persons 2,126 Persons 677.35 Persons Bulgaria
2010s 2,792 Persons 1,965 Persons 826.52 Persons Bulgaria
2020s 2,752 Persons 2,106 Persons 646.33 Persons Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on national definition, Bulgaria or Denmark?
Bulgaria, at 2,756 Persons against 2,120 Persons in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on national definition between Bulgaria and Denmark?
636 Persons, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Denmark?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Bulgaria and Denmark rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on national definition?
Bulgaria ranks 29th and Denmark ranks 32nd of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Denmark: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/bulgaria/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/bulgaria/denmark/">Bulgaria vs Denmark: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains data on full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total). National definitions of part-time work vary considerably across OECD countries. Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker’s perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker’s perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent’s perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. Other factors as well affect the international comparability of the estimates. In some countries, the hours’ cut-off is based on hours for the main job, in others on total hours for all jobs. Certain countries do not consider unpaid family workers to be employed unless they work more than a minimum number of hours, so that such workers do not enter into counts for part-time workers. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.