Austria vs Israel: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition

Austria
3,103 Persons
in 2025
Israel
3,479 Persons
in 2025
Austria rank
27th
Israel rank
26th

Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition over time

  • Austria
  • Israel
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520102025

How they compare

Israel currently reports 3,479 Persons against 3,103 Persons in Austria, a difference of 376 Persons.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 27th and Israel ranks 26th of 40 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Israel in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Israel Difference Ahead
1990s 3,095 Persons 1,586 Persons 1,509 Persons Austria
2000s 3,027 Persons 1,886 Persons 1,141 Persons Austria
2010s 3,028 Persons 2,746 Persons 281.71 Persons Austria
2020s 3,083 Persons 3,276 Persons 193.4 Persons Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher full-time and part-time employment based on national definition, Austria or Israel?
Israel, at 3,479 Persons against 3,103 Persons in Austria as of 2025.
What is the difference in full-time and part-time employment based on national definition between Austria and Israel?
376 Persons, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Israel?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Austria and Israel rank globally for full-time and part-time employment based on national definition?
Austria ranks 27th and Israel ranks 26th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Israel: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/austria/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definition/austria/israel/">Austria vs Israel: Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Full-time and part-time employment based on national definition
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains data on full-time and part-time employment based on national definition. Data are broken down by professional status - employees, total employment - sex and standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55+, total). National definitions of part-time work vary considerably across OECD countries. Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker’s perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker’s perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent’s perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. Other factors as well affect the international comparability of the estimates. In some countries, the hours’ cut-off is based on hours for the main job, in others on total hours for all jobs. Certain countries do not consider unpaid family workers to be employed unless they work more than a minimum number of hours, so that such workers do not enter into counts for part-time workers. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.