Pakistan vs Tunisia: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Pakistan
28.21
in 2025
Tunisia
26.68
in 2023
Pakistan rank
180th
Tunisia rank
182nd
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Pakistan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 28.21 against 26.68 in Tunisia, a difference of 1.53.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Tunisia ahead.
Pakistan ranks 180th and Tunisia ranks 182nd of 194 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6.67 | 19.49 | 12.82 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 12.99 | 20.62 | 7.63 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 14.05 | 23.27 | 9.23 | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 18.62 | 22.87 | 4.25 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 22.59 | 25.68 | 3.09 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 22.7 | 33.53 | 10.83 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Pakistan or Tunisia?
- Pakistan, at 28.21 against 26.68 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Pakistan and Tunisia?
- 1.53, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
- How do Pakistan and Tunisia rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Pakistan ranks 180th and Tunisia ranks 182nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.