Naoero vs Samoa: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Naoero
34.36
in 2024
Samoa
31.41
in 2022
Naoero rank
173rd
Samoa rank
175th
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Naoero
- Samoa
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 34.36 against 31.41 in Samoa, a difference of 2.95.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Samoa ahead.
Naoero ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 175th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.52 | 22.68 | 4.16 | Samoa |
| 2000s | 36.64 | 33.38 | 3.26 | Naoero |
| 2010s | 52.72 | 24.04 | 28.69 | Naoero |
| 2020s | 53.05 | 31.53 | 21.52 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Naoero or Samoa?
- Naoero, at 34.36 against 31.41 in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Naoero and Samoa?
- 2.95, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Samoa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2022.
- How do Naoero and Samoa rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Naoero ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 175th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.