Malawi vs Suriname: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Malawi
44.8
in 2024
Suriname
45.34
in 2016
Malawi rank
146th
Suriname rank
144th
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 45.34 against 44.8 in Malawi, a difference of 0.54.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 144th of 194 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 75.33 | 38.83 | 36.5 | Malawi |
| 1990s | 75.48 | 33.02 | 42.46 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 68.29 | 48.51 | 19.78 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Malawi or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 45.34 against 44.8 in Malawi as of 2016.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Malawi and Suriname?
- 0.54, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2016.
- How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 144th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.