Hong Kong, China vs Serbia: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Hong Kong, China
52.69
in 2025
Serbia
52.45
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
112th
Serbia rank
113th
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Serbia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 52.69 against 52.45 in Serbia, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 112th and Serbia ranks 113th of 194 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.64 | 43.61 | 9.04 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 54.25 | 42.86 | 11.39 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 53.11 | 50.38 | 2.73 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Hong Kong, China or Serbia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 52.69 against 52.45 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Hong Kong, China and Serbia?
- 0.24, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Serbia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Serbia rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 112th and Serbia ranks 113th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.