Gambia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Gambia
47.44
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
47.07
in 2024
Gambia rank
134th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
137th
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Gambia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 47.44 against 47.07 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 134th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 137th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 70 | 38.29 | 31.71 | Gambia |
| 1990s | 44.81 | 43.46 | 1.36 | Gambia |
| 2010s | 54.88 | 49.63 | 5.26 | Gambia |
| 2020s | 45.89 | 46.9 | 1.01 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Gambia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Gambia, at 47.44 against 47.07 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Gambia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.37, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Gambia ranks 134th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 137th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.