Cuba vs United States of America: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Cuba
57.3
in 2013
United States of America
57.28
in 2025
Cuba rank
77th
United States of America rank
78th
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- United States of America
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 57.3 against 57.28 in United States of America, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1986 it was United States of America ahead.
Cuba ranks 77th and United States of America ranks 78th of 194 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 40.83 | 55.97 | 15.13 | United States of America |
| 2000s | 38.91 | 59.36 | 20.45 | United States of America |
| 2010s | 50.1 | 57.9 | 7.81 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Cuba or United States of America?
- Cuba, at 57.3 against 57.28 in United States of America as of 2013.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Cuba and United States of America?
- 0.02, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and United States of America?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2013.
- How do Cuba and United States of America rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 77th and United States of America ranks 78th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.