Costa Rica vs Liberia: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Costa Rica
44.11
in 2025
Liberia
43.63
in 2017
Costa Rica rank
147th
Liberia rank
148th
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Liberia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 44.11 against 43.63 in Liberia, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Liberia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 147th and Liberia ranks 148th of 194 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 22.28 | 45.69 | 23.41 | Liberia |
| 2000s | 45.92 | 63.7 | 17.78 | Liberia |
| 2010s | 48.14 | 62.8 | 14.67 | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Liberia?
- Costa Rica, at 44.11 against 43.63 in Liberia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Liberia?
- 0.48, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Liberia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2017.
- How do Costa Rica and Liberia rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 147th and Liberia ranks 148th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.