Belarus vs Sweden: Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled
Belarus
65.69
in 2024
Sweden
64.6
in 2025
Belarus rank
29th
Sweden rank
31st
Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- Sweden
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 65.69 against 64.6 in Sweden, a difference of 1.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Sweden ahead.
Belarus ranks 29th and Sweden ranks 31st of 194 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 61.31 | 82.26 | 20.95 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 49.6 | 55.96 | 6.36 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 49.36 | 58.85 | 9.49 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 70.42 | 70.21 | 0.2068 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 65.64 | 65.18 | 0.4562 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled, Belarus or Sweden?
- Belarus, at 65.69 against 64.6 in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled between Belarus and Sweden?
- 1.09, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 29th and Sweden ranks 31st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Fertility and female labor force participation, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fertility and female labor force participation with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.