Samoa vs Sri Lanka: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled
Samoa
31.41
in 2022
Sri Lanka
29.78
in 2024
Samoa rank
175th
Sri Lanka rank
178th
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled over time
- Samoa
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 31.41 against 29.78 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.63.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Samoa ranks 175th and Sri Lanka ranks 178th of 194 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 14.81 | 30.7 | 15.89 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 14.63 | 20.8 | 6.17 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 40.17 | 41.1 | 0.926 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 32.78 | 32.93 | 0.1487 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 29.73 | 34.54 | 4.81 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 31.65 | 31.88 | 0.2316 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Samoa or Sri Lanka?
- Samoa, at 31.41 against 29.78 in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Samoa and Sri Lanka?
- 1.63, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
- How do Samoa and Sri Lanka rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Samoa ranks 175th and Sri Lanka ranks 178th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.