Romania vs East Timor: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled (slopes)
Romania
42
in 2025
East Timor
40.87
in 2022
Romania rank
159th
East Timor rank
162nd
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled (slopes) over time
- Romania
- East Timor
How they compare
Romania currently reports 42 against 40.87 in East Timor, a difference of 1.13.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 159th and East Timor ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.08 | 45.63 | 3.45 | Romania |
| 2010s | 45.76 | 41.84 | 3.91 | Romania |
| 2020s | 41.66 | 34.39 | 7.27 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Romania or East Timor?
- Romania, at 42 against 40.87 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Romania and East Timor?
- 1.13, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and East Timor?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Romania and East Timor rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Romania ranks 159th and East Timor ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.