Norway vs Paraguay: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled
Norway
61.7
in 2025
Paraguay
61.3
in 2025
Norway rank
48th
Paraguay rank
51st
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled over time
- Norway
- Paraguay
How they compare
Norway currently reports 61.7 against 61.3 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.4.
Across all 38 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 48th and Paraguay ranks 51st of 194 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 59.43 | 37.65 | 21.78 | Norway |
| 1990s | 64.87 | 52.5 | 12.37 | Norway |
| 2000s | 69.39 | 53.71 | 15.68 | Norway |
| 2010s | 67.68 | 56.96 | 10.72 | Norway |
| 2020s | 61.83 | 59.22 | 2.61 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Norway or Paraguay?
- Norway, at 61.7 against 61.3 in Paraguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Norway and Paraguay?
- 0.4, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Paraguay?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Paraguay rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Norway ranks 48th and Paraguay ranks 51st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.