Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled
Latvia
56.7
in 2025
Zimbabwe
56.64
in 2024
Latvia rank
86th
Zimbabwe rank
87th
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 56.7 against 56.64 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.06.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 194 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.77 | 65.27 | 14.49 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 50.74 | 77.46 | 26.71 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 54.11 | 69.14 | 15.03 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 55.52 | 59.73 | 4.2 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Latvia, at 56.7 against 56.64 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.06, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.