Finland vs Lithuania: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled
Finland
57.7
in 2025
Lithuania
58.6
in 2025
Finland rank
70th
Lithuania rank
67th
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled over time
- Finland
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 58.6 against 57.7 in Finland, a difference of 0.9.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Lithuania ahead.
Finland ranks 70th and Lithuania ranks 67th of 194 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 58.51 | 60.16 | 1.65 | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 55.68 | 56.88 | 1.2 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 57.99 | 52.14 | 5.85 | Finland |
| 2010s | 55.63 | 54.5 | 1.14 | Finland |
| 2020s | 57.32 | 58.18 | 0.8562 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Finland or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 58.6 against 57.7 in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Finland and Lithuania?
- 0.9, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Lithuania?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Lithuania rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Finland ranks 70th and Lithuania ranks 67th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.