Aruba vs Barbados: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled
Aruba
58.8
in 2011
Barbados
59.17
in 2024
Aruba rank
66th
Barbados rank
64th
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Barbados
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 59.17 against 58.8 in Aruba, a difference of 0.37.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 66th and Barbados ranks 64th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25.73 | 30.5 | 4.77 | Barbados |
| 1980s | 40.09 | 53.15 | 13.06 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 50.7 | 58.21 | 7.51 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 59.98 | 62.2 | 2.22 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 59.53 | 62.52 | 2.99 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Aruba or Barbados?
- Barbados, at 59.17 against 58.8 in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Aruba and Barbados?
- 0.37, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Barbados?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Aruba and Barbados rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 66th and Barbados ranks 64th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.