Argentina vs Brazil: Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled
Argentina
53.29
in 2025
Brazil
53.67
in 2025
Argentina rank
109th
Brazil rank
106th
Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled over time
- Argentina
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 53.67 against 53.29 in Argentina, a difference of 0.38.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 106th of 194 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.2 | 18.45 | 4.75 | Argentina |
| 1970s | 28.66 | 28.7 | 0.0376 | Brazil |
| 1980s | 28.23 | 40.54 | 12.3 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 40.12 | 49.82 | 9.69 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 47.82 | 56.49 | 8.67 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 48.39 | 53.83 | 5.44 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 51.04 | 52.77 | 1.73 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled, Argentina or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 53.67 against 53.29 in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled between Argentina and Brazil?
- 0.38, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled?
- Argentina ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 106th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Female labor force participation rates slopes, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female labor force participation rates slopes with 782 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.