Botswana vs Peru: Female labor force participation rates by family benefits public spending
Botswana
63.7%
in 2025
Peru
65.0%
in 2025
Botswana rank
26th
Peru rank
24th
Female labor force participation rates by family benefits public spending over time
- Botswana
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 65.0% against 63.7% in Botswana, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 26th and Peru ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.9% | 48.9% | 0.0% | Peru |
| 2000s | 52.5% | 63.9% | 11.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 55.9% | 69.8% | 13.9% | Peru |
| 2020s | 60.9% | 64.4% | 3.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female labor force participation rates by family benefits public spending, Botswana or Peru?
- Peru, at 65.0% against 63.7% in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in female labor force participation rates by family benefits public spending between Botswana and Peru?
- 1.3%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Peru?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Peru rank globally for female labor force participation rates by family benefits public spending?
- Botswana ranks 26th and Peru ranks 24th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Female labor force participation rates by family benefits public spending. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of the female working-age population (ages 15 and over) who are economically active (employed or unemployed).