Hong Kong vs Zimbabwe: Fatal occupational injury rates
Hong Kong
6.78 per 100,000 employees
in 2016
Zimbabwe
6 per 100,000 employees
in 2022
Hong Kong rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
18th
Fatal occupational injury rates over time
- Hong Kong
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 6.78 per 100,000 employees against 6 per 100,000 employees in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.78 per 100,000 employees.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 79 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.3 per 100,000 employees | 6.93 per 100,000 employees | 0.374 per 100,000 employees | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 7 per 100,000 employees | 9 per 100,000 employees | 2 per 100,000 employees | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fatal occupational injury rates, Hong Kong or Zimbabwe?
- Hong Kong, at 6.78 per 100,000 employees against 6 per 100,000 employees in Zimbabwe as of 2016.
- What is the difference in fatal occupational injury rates between Hong Kong and Zimbabwe?
- 0.78 per 100,000 employees, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Hong Kong and Zimbabwe rank globally for fatal occupational injury rates?
- Hong Kong ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fatal occupational injury rates. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fatal occupational injuries among employees, by sex and migrant status (per 100,000 employees).