Australia vs Malta: Employment-to-population ratio (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Australia
64.15
in 2025
Malta
65.43
in 2025
Australia rank
13th
Malta rank
12th
Employment-to-population ratio (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Australia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 65.43 against 64.15 in Australia, a difference of 1.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 13th and Malta ranks 12th of 78 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.65 | 47.02 | 16.63 | Australia |
| 2010s | 62.83 | 56.64 | 6.19 | Australia |
| 2020s | 63.53 | 67.07 | 3.54 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment-to-population ratio (previous ilo definition - icls13), Australia or Malta?
- Malta, at 65.43 against 64.15 in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employment-to-population ratio (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Australia and Malta?
- 1.28, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malta?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Malta rank globally for employment-to-population ratio (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- Australia ranks 13th and Malta ranks 12th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Employment-to-population ratio (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The employment-to-population ratio is the number of persons who are employed as a percent of the total of working-age population. For more information, refer to the International Labour Migration Statistics (ILMS) database description.