South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Uzbekistan: Employment

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
201,367
in 2025
Uzbekistan
13,962
in 2025
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
43rd
Uzbekistan rank
44th

Employment over time

  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
  • Uzbekistan
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199120082025

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income currently reports 201,367 against 13,962 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 187,405.

That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's figure about 14.4 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 44th of 87 groups.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 124,434 7,320 117,114 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2000s 146,816 9,091 137,725 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2010s 175,977 11,614 164,363 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
2020s 194,301 13,305 180,996 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income or Uzbekistan?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, at 201,367 against 13,962 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in employment between South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Uzbekistan?
187,405, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Uzbekistan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Uzbekistan rank globally for employment?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 44th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Uzbekistan: Employment. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-ilo-modelled-estimates/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-ilo-modelled-estimates/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/uzbekistan/">South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Uzbekistan: Employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 9,646 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The employed comprise all persons of working age who, during a specified brief period, were in one of the following categories: a) paid employment (whether at work or with a job but not at work); or b) self-employment (whether at work or with an enterprise but not at work). Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.