APEC vs Japan: Employment
Employment over time
- APEC
- Japan
How they compare
APEC currently reports 1.53 million against 67,630 in Japan, a difference of 1.46 million.
That makes APEC's figure about 22.7 times Japan's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, APEC has been ahead every year.
APEC ranks 7th and Japan ranks 10th of 87 groups.
APEC has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | APEC | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.21 million | 65,056 | 1.15 million | APEC |
| 2000s | 1.35 million | 63,801 | 1.28 million | APEC |
| 2010s | 1.47 million | 64,224 | 1.40 million | APEC |
| 2020s | 1.51 million | 67,178 | 1.44 million | APEC |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment, APEC or Japan?
- APEC, at 1.53 million against 67,630 in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employment between APEC and Japan?
- 1.46 million, with APEC ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for APEC and Japan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do APEC and Japan rank globally for employment?
- APEC ranks 7th and Japan ranks 10th of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The employed comprise all persons of working age who, during a specified brief period, were in one of the following categories: a) paid employment (whether at work or with a job but not at work); or b) self-employment (whether at work or with an enterprise but not at work). Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.