Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
3.51 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
4.77 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Singapore rank
2nd

Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Singapore
012345199120072023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 4.77 units per square kilometre against 3.51 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.26 units per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 2.91 units per square kilometre 2.61 units per square kilometre 0.306 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 3.2 units per square kilometre 3.28 units per square kilometre 0.0799 units per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 3.58 units per square kilometre 4.4 units per square kilometre 0.8231 units per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 3.52 units per square kilometre 4.63 units per square kilometre 1.11 units per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment (ilo modelled estimates), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 4.77 units per square kilometre against 3.51 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment (ilo modelled estimates), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
1.26 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,114 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.