Iceland vs Macao: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per capita
Iceland
0.0006 units per person
in 2025
Macao
0.0006 units per person
in 2025
Iceland rank
6th
Macao rank
7th
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per capita over time
- Iceland
- Macao
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0006 units per person against 0.0006 units per person in Macao, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 6th and Macao ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | 0 units per person | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0 units per person | Macao |
| 2020s | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0 units per person | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment (ilo modelled estimates), per capita, Iceland or Macao?
- Iceland, at 0.0006 units per person against 0.0006 units per person in Macao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employment (ilo modelled estimates), per capita between Iceland and Macao?
- 0 units per person, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Macao?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Macao rank globally for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per capita?
- Iceland ranks 6th and Macao ranks 7th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.