Cuba vs Georgia: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per capita
Cuba
0.0004 units per person
in 2025
Georgia
0.0004 units per person
in 2025
Cuba rank
91st
Georgia rank
93rd
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.0004 units per person against 0.0004 units per person in Georgia, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Georgia ahead.
Cuba ranks 91st and Georgia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 units per person | 0.0006 units per person | 0.0002 units per person | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.0004 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | 0.0001 units per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0004 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | 0 units per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0004 units per person | 0.0004 units per person | 0 units per person | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment (ilo modelled estimates), per capita, Cuba or Georgia?
- Cuba, at 0.0004 units per person against 0.0004 units per person in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employment (ilo modelled estimates), per capita between Cuba and Georgia?
- 0 units per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 91st and Georgia ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.