Macao vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Macao
12.35 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0198 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Macao
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.557.51012.5199120072023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 12.35 units per square kilometre against 0.0198 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 12.33 units per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 624.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 186 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 9.05 units per square kilometre 0.0105 units per square kilometre 9.04 units per square kilometre Macao
2000s 9.31 units per square kilometre 0.0135 units per square kilometre 9.3 units per square kilometre Macao
2010s 12.03 units per square kilometre 0.016 units per square kilometre 12.01 units per square kilometre Macao
2020s 12.07 units per square kilometre 0.0186 units per square kilometre 12.05 units per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Macao or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Macao, at 12.35 units per square kilometre against 0.0198 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Macao and Sub-Saharan Africa?
12.33 units per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Sub-Saharan Africa?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Macao and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for employment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Macao ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/">Macao vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,114 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

Employment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.