Japan vs Netherlands: Employment by professional status

Japan
68,280 Persons
in 2025
Netherlands
9,899 Persons
in 2025
Japan rank
4th
Netherlands rank
3rd

Employment by professional status over time

  • Japan
  • Netherlands
020.0k40.0k60.0k195519902025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 68,280 Persons against 9,899 Persons in Netherlands, a difference of 58,381 Persons.

That makes Japan's figure about 6.9 times Netherlands's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 3rd of 33 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 53,446 Persons 4,715 Persons 48,731 Persons Japan
1980s 57,964 Persons 5,305 Persons 52,659 Persons Japan
1990s 64,433 Persons 6,856 Persons 57,577 Persons Japan
2000s 63,650 Persons 8,107 Persons 55,543 Persons Japan
2010s 63,900 Persons 8,458 Persons 55,442 Persons Japan
2020s 67,370 Persons 9,565 Persons 57,805 Persons Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment by professional status, Japan or Netherlands?
Japan, at 68,280 Persons against 9,899 Persons in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in employment by professional status between Japan and Netherlands?
58,381 Persons, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Netherlands?
51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
How do Japan and Netherlands rank globally for employment by professional status?
Japan ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 3rd of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Employment by professional status (ICSE-93). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Netherlands: Employment by professional status. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/japan/netherlands-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/japan/netherlands-2/">Japan vs Netherlands: Employment by professional status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment by professional status (ICSE-93)
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
43 places, 2,053 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The dataflow "Employment by profesional status (ICSE-93)" is a subset of the “Employment by activites and status (ALFS)” dataset which presents annual labour force statistics for OECD member countries, Brazil and 4 geographical areas (Major Seven, Euro zone, European Union and OECD-Total). This dataflow contains employment statistics for all economic activities broken down by professional status as defined by the ICSE-1993 including employees, employers and own-account workers, and unpaid family workers. Economic activities are defined according to the Major divisions of the International standard International Classification (ISIC) Rev. 4 with the exception of the United-States wich compiled since 2003, employment data by sector following the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS); NAICS sector are then proxied to ISIC Rev. 4 and are therefore not strictly comparable with other countries’ data. The professional status is defined in the International Classification by status in Employment (ICSE-1993). To be considered as an unpaid family worker, the hour-threshold varies from one hour to 18 hours a week. Data are presented in thousands of persons, or as indices with base year 2015=100. Annual data in this dataset are typically calculated as averages of infra-annual estimates. This can lead to differences with annual data published by National Statistics Institutes.