Japan vs Mexico: Employment by professional status

Japan
68,280 Persons
in 2025
Mexico
59,440 Persons
in 2025
Japan rank
4th
Mexico rank
5th

Employment by professional status over time

  • Japan
  • Mexico
20.0k40.0k60.0k195519902025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 68,280 Persons against 59,440 Persons in Mexico, a difference of 8,840 Persons.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 4th and Mexico ranks 5th of 33 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 50,940 Persons 12,424 Persons 38,516 Persons Japan
1980s 55,360 Persons 21,393 Persons 33,967 Persons Japan
1990s 64,433 Persons 32,090 Persons 32,343 Persons Japan
2000s 63,650 Persons 41,300 Persons 22,350 Persons Japan
2010s 63,900 Persons 50,227 Persons 13,673 Persons Japan
2020s 67,370 Persons 56,853 Persons 10,517 Persons Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment by professional status, Japan or Mexico?
Japan, at 68,280 Persons against 59,440 Persons in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in employment by professional status between Japan and Mexico?
8,840 Persons, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mexico?
38 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Japan and Mexico rank globally for employment by professional status?
Japan ranks 4th and Mexico ranks 5th of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Employment by professional status (ICSE-93). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Mexico: Employment by professional status. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/japan/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/japan/mexico/">Japan vs Mexico: Employment by professional status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment by professional status (ICSE-93)
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
43 places, 2,053 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The dataflow "Employment by profesional status (ICSE-93)" is a subset of the “Employment by activites and status (ALFS)” dataset which presents annual labour force statistics for OECD member countries, Brazil and 4 geographical areas (Major Seven, Euro zone, European Union and OECD-Total). This dataflow contains employment statistics for all economic activities broken down by professional status as defined by the ICSE-1993 including employees, employers and own-account workers, and unpaid family workers. Economic activities are defined according to the Major divisions of the International standard International Classification (ISIC) Rev. 4 with the exception of the United-States wich compiled since 2003, employment data by sector following the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS); NAICS sector are then proxied to ISIC Rev. 4 and are therefore not strictly comparable with other countries’ data. The professional status is defined in the International Classification by status in Employment (ICSE-1993). To be considered as an unpaid family worker, the hour-threshold varies from one hour to 18 hours a week. Data are presented in thousands of persons, or as indices with base year 2015=100. Annual data in this dataset are typically calculated as averages of infra-annual estimates. This can lead to differences with annual data published by National Statistics Institutes.