Estonia vs Japan: Employment by professional status

Estonia
698.77 Persons
in 2025
Japan
68,280 Persons
in 2025
Estonia rank
7th
Japan rank
4th

Employment by professional status over time

  • Estonia
  • Japan
020.0k40.0k60.0k195519902025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 68,280 Persons against 698.77 Persons in Estonia, a difference of 67,581 Persons.

That makes Japan's figure about 97.7 times Estonia's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 7th and Japan ranks 4th of 7 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Japan Difference Ahead
1980s 836.2 Persons 61,280 Persons 60,444 Persons Japan
1990s 680.55 Persons 64,433 Persons 63,752 Persons Japan
2000s 614.44 Persons 63,650 Persons 63,036 Persons Japan
2010s 631.25 Persons 63,900 Persons 63,269 Persons Japan
2020s 682.38 Persons 67,370 Persons 66,688 Persons Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment by professional status, Estonia or Japan?
Japan, at 68,280 Persons against 698.77 Persons in Estonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in employment by professional status between Estonia and Japan?
67,581 Persons, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Japan?
37 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
How do Estonia and Japan rank globally for employment by professional status?
Estonia ranks 7th and Japan ranks 4th of 7 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Employment by professional status (ICSE-93). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Japan: Employment by professional status. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/estonia-2/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/estonia-2/japan/">Estonia vs Japan: Employment by professional status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment by professional status (ICSE-93)
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
43 places, 2,053 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The dataflow "Employment by profesional status (ICSE-93)" is a subset of the “Employment by activites and status (ALFS)” dataset which presents annual labour force statistics for OECD member countries, Brazil and 4 geographical areas (Major Seven, Euro zone, European Union and OECD-Total). This dataflow contains employment statistics for all economic activities broken down by professional status as defined by the ICSE-1993 including employees, employers and own-account workers, and unpaid family workers. Economic activities are defined according to the Major divisions of the International standard International Classification (ISIC) Rev. 4 with the exception of the United-States wich compiled since 2003, employment data by sector following the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS); NAICS sector are then proxied to ISIC Rev. 4 and are therefore not strictly comparable with other countries’ data. The professional status is defined in the International Classification by status in Employment (ICSE-1993). To be considered as an unpaid family worker, the hour-threshold varies from one hour to 18 hours a week. Data are presented in thousands of persons, or as indices with base year 2015=100. Annual data in this dataset are typically calculated as averages of infra-annual estimates. This can lead to differences with annual data published by National Statistics Institutes.