Belgium vs Czechia: Employment by professional status

Belgium
5,147 Persons
in 2025
Czechia
5,253 Persons
in 2025
Belgium rank
19th
Czechia rank
18th

Employment by professional status over time

  • Belgium
  • Czechia
02.0k4.0k6.0k195619902025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 5,253 Persons against 5,147 Persons in Belgium, a difference of 106 Persons.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 19th and Czechia ranks 18th of 33 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Czechia Difference Ahead
1970s 3,644 Persons 5,052 Persons 1,408 Persons Czechia
1980s 3,567 Persons 5,185 Persons 1,618 Persons Czechia
1990s 3,760 Persons 4,839 Persons 1,079 Persons Czechia
2000s 4,217 Persons 4,794 Persons 576.54 Persons Czechia
2010s 4,596 Persons 5,056 Persons 459.86 Persons Czechia
2020s 4,981 Persons 5,188 Persons 207 Persons Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment by professional status, Belgium or Czechia?
Czechia, at 5,253 Persons against 5,147 Persons in Belgium as of 2025.
What is the difference in employment by professional status between Belgium and Czechia?
106 Persons, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Czechia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Czechia rank globally for employment by professional status?
Belgium ranks 19th and Czechia ranks 18th of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Employment by professional status (ICSE-93). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Czechia: Employment by professional status. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/belgium/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-professional-status-icse-93/belgium/czechia/">Belgium vs Czechia: Employment by professional status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment by professional status (ICSE-93)
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
43 places, 2,053 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The dataflow "Employment by profesional status (ICSE-93)" is a subset of the “Employment by activites and status (ALFS)” dataset which presents annual labour force statistics for OECD member countries, Brazil and 4 geographical areas (Major Seven, Euro zone, European Union and OECD-Total). This dataflow contains employment statistics for all economic activities broken down by professional status as defined by the ICSE-1993 including employees, employers and own-account workers, and unpaid family workers. Economic activities are defined according to the Major divisions of the International standard International Classification (ISIC) Rev. 4 with the exception of the United-States wich compiled since 2003, employment data by sector following the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS); NAICS sector are then proxied to ISIC Rev. 4 and are therefore not strictly comparable with other countries’ data. The professional status is defined in the International Classification by status in Employment (ICSE-1993). To be considered as an unpaid family worker, the hour-threshold varies from one hour to 18 hours a week. Data are presented in thousands of persons, or as indices with base year 2015=100. Annual data in this dataset are typically calculated as averages of infra-annual estimates. This can lead to differences with annual data published by National Statistics Institutes.