Korea vs Lithuania: Employment by permanency of the job - Incidence — Permanent employment

Korea
72.52 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Lithuania
98.18 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Korea rank
3rd
Lithuania rank
1st

Employment by permanency of the job - Incidence — Permanent employment over time

  • Korea
  • Lithuania
020406080100199820112025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 98.18 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 72.52 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Korea, a difference of 25.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times Korea's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 1st of 3 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 74.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 95.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 21.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Lithuania
2010s 77.62 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 97.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 20.19 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Lithuania
2020s 72.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 98.25 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 25.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment by permanency of the job - incidence — permanent employment, Korea or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 98.18 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 72.52 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in employment by permanency of the job - incidence — permanent employment between Korea and Lithuania?
25.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Lithuania?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Korea and Lithuania rank globally for employment by permanency of the job - incidence — permanent employment?
Korea ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Employment by permanency of the job - Incidence — Permanent employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Lithuania: Employment by permanency of the job - Incidence — Permanent employment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-permanency-of-the-job-incidence-permanent-employment/korea/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/employment-by-permanency-of-the-job-incidence-permanent-employment/korea/lithuania-2/">Korea vs Lithuania: Employment by permanency of the job - Incidence — Permanent employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment by permanency of the job - Incidence — Permanent employment
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,548 data points, 1980–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of temporary employment with standardised age groups (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total). Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Data are reported for employees. Temporary employees are wage and salary workers whose job has a pre-determined termination date as opposed to permanent employees whose job is of unlimited duration. They include: i) persons with a seasonal job; ii) persons engaged by an employment agency or business and hired out to a third party for carrying out a “work mission”; iii) persons with specific training contracts (including apprentices, trainees, research assistants, probationary period of a contract, etc.). Country-specific exceptions to this generic definition may be found in LFS_NOTES_SOURCES. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates