Tanzania vs United Kingdom: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- Tanzania
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 1.7% against 1.6% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Tanzania ranks 146th and United Kingdom ranks 149th of 187 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 2.6% | 1.0% | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 1.6% | 2.8% | 1.2% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 2.4% | 0.8% | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 1.7% | 0.0% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), Tanzania or United Kingdom?
- Tanzania, at 1.7% against 1.6% in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between Tanzania and United Kingdom?
- 0.1%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and United Kingdom?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Tanzania and United Kingdom rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- Tanzania ranks 146th and United Kingdom ranks 149th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).