New Zealand vs Uganda: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- New Zealand
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 6.1% against 5.8% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 26th and Uganda ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.5% | 1.9% | 5.6% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 6.6% | 2.0% | 4.7% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 6.1% | 2.3% | 3.8% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 5.8% | 5.9% | 0.1% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), New Zealand or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 6.1% against 5.8% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between New Zealand and Uganda?
- 0.3%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Uganda rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- New Zealand ranks 26th and Uganda ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).