Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- Mauritius
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 3.0% against 2.9% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 116th and New Caledonia ranks 114th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.2% | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.1% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 0.9% | 0.8% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 2.5% | 0.0% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), Mauritius or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 3.0% against 2.9% in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 0.1%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- Mauritius ranks 116th and New Caledonia ranks 114th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).