Liberia vs Pakistan: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- Liberia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 1.5% against 1.5% in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 156th and Pakistan ranks 157th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.2% | Liberia |
| 2000s | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.6% | Liberia |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 1.3% | 0.2% | Liberia |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), Liberia or Pakistan?
- Liberia, at 1.5% against 1.5% in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between Liberia and Pakistan?
- 0.0%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Pakistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Liberia and Pakistan rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- Liberia ranks 156th and Pakistan ranks 157th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).