IBRD only vs New Zealand: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- IBRD only
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 5.8% against 3.7% in IBRD only, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.6 times IBRD only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 29th and New Zealand ranks 26th of 47 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.1% | 7.5% | 4.4% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 6.6% | 3.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 6.1% | 2.7% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 5.8% | 2.2% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), IBRD only or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 5.8% against 3.7% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between IBRD only and New Zealand?
- 2.1%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do IBRD only and New Zealand rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- IBRD only ranks 29th and New Zealand ranks 26th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).