High income vs Latvia: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- High income
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.0% against 3.1% in High income, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.6 times High income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was High income ahead.
High income ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, High income averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.9% | 3.0% | 0.8% | High income |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 3.6% | 0.1% | High income |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 4.3% | 1.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 3.1% | 4.8% | 1.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), High income or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.0% against 3.1% in High income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between High income and Latvia?
- 1.9%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Latvia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do High income and Latvia rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- High income ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 38th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).