French Polynesia vs Singapore: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- French Polynesia
- Singapore
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 3.4% against 3.4% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Singapore ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 91st and Singapore ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.3% | 5.6% | 2.3% | Singapore |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 5.2% | 1.8% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 5.4% | 2.0% | Singapore |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 3.7% | 0.3% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), French Polynesia or Singapore?
- French Polynesia, at 3.4% against 3.4% in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between French Polynesia and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Singapore?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Singapore rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- French Polynesia ranks 91st and Singapore ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).