Eswatini vs Vietnam: Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate) over time
- Eswatini
- Vietnam
How they compare
Vietnam currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Vietnam's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Vietnam ahead.
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Vietnam ranks 140th of 187 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.4% | 3.3% | 0.9% | Vietnam |
| 2000s | 2.4% | 3.5% | 1.1% | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 2.6% | 0.4% | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 2.1% | 0.2% | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), Eswatini or Vietnam?
- Vietnam, at 1.9% against 1.8% in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between Eswatini and Vietnam?
- 0.1%, with Vietnam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Vietnam?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Vietnam rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- Eswatini ranks 142nd and Vietnam ranks 140th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).