Cote d'Ivoire vs Kyrgyzstan: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.5% against 1.5% in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 155th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 154th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 2.2% | 0.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.2% | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), Cote d'Ivoire or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.5% against 1.5% in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between Cote d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 155th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 154th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).