Austria vs Equatorial Guinea: Employers, total (% of total employment)
Employers, total (% of total employment) over time
- Austria
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4.4% against 4.3% in Austria, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Austria ranks 56th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th of 187 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.2% | 3.4% | 0.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 4.5% | 0.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 3.7% | 4.5% | 0.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 4.2% | 4.4% | 0.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, total (% of total employment), Austria or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 4.4% against 4.3% in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, total (% of total employment) between Austria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.1%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for employers, total (% of total employment)?
- Austria ranks 56th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 54th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).