East Timor vs Uzbekistan: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- East Timor
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 16.8% against 14.2% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
East Timor ranks 3rd and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 187 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.3% | 14.3% | 5.0% | East Timor |
| 2000s | 18.7% | 14.7% | 4.0% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 19.1% | 14.6% | 4.5% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 14.3% | 3.3% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), East Timor or Uzbekistan?
- East Timor, at 16.8% against 14.2% in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between East Timor and Uzbekistan?
- 2.6%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Uzbekistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do East Timor and Uzbekistan rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- East Timor ranks 3rd and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).