Sierra Leone vs Tanzania: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- Sierra Leone
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 2.3% against 2.1% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 150th and Tanzania ranks 147th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.4% | 2.3% | 0.0% | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 2.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 2.3% | 0.1% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), Sierra Leone or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 2.3% against 2.1% in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between Sierra Leone and Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Tanzania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Sierra Leone and Tanzania rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 150th and Tanzania ranks 147th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).