New Zealand vs South Africa: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- New Zealand
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 7.6% against 7.4% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 27th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 7.3% | 2.8% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 8.8% | 8.1% | 0.7% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 8.0% | 7.7% | 0.3% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 7.5% | 7.8% | 0.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), New Zealand or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 7.6% against 7.4% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between New Zealand and South Africa?
- 0.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Africa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and South Africa rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- New Zealand ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 27th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).