Mauritius vs Suriname: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Mauritius
4.2%
in 2025
Suriname
4.2%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
95th
Suriname rank
96th
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- Mauritius
- Suriname
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 4.2% against 4.2% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Suriname ahead.
Mauritius ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 96th of 187 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 2.7% | 2.0% | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 2.4% | 1.5% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2.0% | 3.9% | 1.9% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 4.2% | 0.6% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), Mauritius or Suriname?
- Mauritius, at 4.2% against 4.2% in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between Mauritius and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- Mauritius ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 96th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).