Mauritius vs Singapore: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Mauritius
4.2%
in 2025
Singapore
4.4%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
95th
Singapore rank
92nd
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- Mauritius
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 4.4% against 4.2% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 95th and Singapore ranks 92nd of 187 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7% | 7.7% | 7.0% | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 6.9% | 6.0% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 2.0% | 7.0% | 5.0% | Singapore |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 4.8% | 1.3% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), Mauritius or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 4.4% against 4.2% in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between Mauritius and Singapore?
- 0.2%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Singapore?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Singapore rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- Mauritius ranks 95th and Singapore ranks 92nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).