South Korea vs Low income: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- South Korea
- Low income
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 6.4% against 3.6% in Low income, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.8 times Low income's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 42nd and Low income ranks 41st of 187 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.8% | 4.0% | 5.8% | South Korea |
| 2000s | 9.5% | 3.8% | 5.7% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 8.0% | 3.4% | 4.6% | South Korea |
| 2020s | 6.4% | 3.7% | 2.6% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), South Korea or Low income?
- South Korea, at 6.4% against 3.6% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between South Korea and Low income?
- 2.8%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Low income?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Low income rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- South Korea ranks 42nd and Low income ranks 41st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).