IDA total vs Uzbekistan: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- IDA total
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 14.2% against 6.9% in IDA total, a difference of 7.3%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.1 times IDA total's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.3% | 14.3% | 7.9% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 6.2% | 14.7% | 8.5% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 6.6% | 14.6% | 8.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 6.9% | 14.3% | 7.4% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), IDA total or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 14.2% against 6.9% in IDA total as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between IDA total and Uzbekistan?
- 7.3%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Uzbekistan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do IDA total and Uzbekistan rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- IDA total ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).