IDA only vs Saint Lucia: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- IDA only
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 6.7% against 3.7% in IDA only, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.8 times IDA only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
IDA only ranks 39th and Saint Lucia ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.7% | 11.8% | 9.0% | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 7.8% | 5.0% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 7.5% | 4.1% | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 3.8% | 7.9% | 4.1% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), IDA only or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 6.7% against 3.7% in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between IDA only and Saint Lucia?
- 3.0%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Saint Lucia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and Saint Lucia rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- IDA only ranks 39th and Saint Lucia ranks 39th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).