French Polynesia vs Suriname: Employers, male (% of male employment)
Employers, male (% of male employment) over time
- French Polynesia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 4.2% against 4.1% in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 98th and Suriname ranks 96th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.2% | 2.7% | 1.5% | French Polynesia |
| 2000s | 4.2% | 2.4% | 1.8% | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 3.9% | 0.3% | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 4.1% | 4.2% | 0.1% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employers, male (% of male employment), French Polynesia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 4.2% against 4.1% in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in employers, male (% of male employment) between French Polynesia and Suriname?
- 0.1%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Suriname rank globally for employers, male (% of male employment)?
- French Polynesia ranks 98th and Suriname ranks 96th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employers are those workers who, working on their own account or with one or a few partners, hold the type of jobs defined as a "self-employment jobs" i.e. jobs where the remuneration is directly dependent upon the profits derived from the goods and services produced), and, in this capacity, have engaged, on a continuous basis, one or more persons to work for them as employee(s).